商科essay/report/assignment/paper代写
IAB204 Assignment 1 Criteria Sheet
IAB204 Business Analysis Assignment 1
Criterion Weight Excellent Performance Good Performance Satisfactory Performance Borderline Performance Poor Performance
25% 0 0 0 0 10
25
The Analysis achieves ALL of the following in a
Highly Effective Way
The Analysis achieves MOST of the following in an
Effective Way
The Analysis achieves SOME of the following in a
Satisfactory Way
The Analysis achieves FEW of the following The Analysis achieves NONE of the following
Needs Assessment
4
Business need cogently addresses each of
goals/objectives (SMART), problem/opportunity
statement, and stakeholder, root cause and current
capabilities analyses.
Capability gap uses objectives to compare
current capabilites with new capabilites and
identifies ALL gaps.
Business need broadly addresses most of
goals/objectives, problem/opportunity statement,
and stakeholder, root cause and current capabilities
analyses.
Capability gap compares current capabilites
with new capabilite s and identifies MOST gaps.
Business need addresses some of
goals/objectives, problem/opportunity statement,
and stakeholder, root cause and current capabilities
analyses.
Capability gap Identifies new capabilites and
SOME gaps.
Business need has identified at least 1
significant need and associated objective, and
includes a problem/opportunity statement and some
evidence of stakeholder, root cause and current
capabilities analyses.
Capability gap Identifies a FEW gaps.
b
Business need has not identified any
significant needs/associated objectives, or included
required analyses.
Capability gap no gaps are identified.
2
Preparation Clear scope, supported by
technique selection and associated resources
articulated.
Preparation Technique selection and
associated resources are identified.
Preparation Some evidence of preparation
supported by technique selection.
Preparation Some evidence of preparation. b Preparation No evidence of preparation.
4
Documented Outputs resulting from
application of the nominated technique are
presented in a meaningful way.
Documented Outputs resulting from
application of the nominated technique are
documented without structure.
Documented Outputs are documented
verbatum.
Documented Random outputs are documented
without clear evidence of processes. b
Documented No evidence of output from the
elicitation.
1.
Prioritise Prioritised requirements resulting
from application of the nominated technique(s) are
presented in a meaningful way.
Prioritise Prioritised requirements appear to
be the result of application of the nominated
technique(s).
Prioritise Prioritised requirements are
documented without reference to strategy.
Prioritise Some prioritised requirements are
documented without strategy. b
Prioritise No evidence of prioritisation.
5
Specify cogently models and articulates the
analysis of each of the requirements using the
nominated techniques. Includes 1 or more correct
Use Case(s) AND a correct Use Case Diagram.
Specify Models MOST of the requirements and
articulates the analysis using the nominated
technique(s). Includes 1 or more mostly correct
Use Case(s) AND a correct Use Case Diagram.
Specify Models SOME of the requirements with
SOME supporting analysis using the nominated
technique(s). Includes 1 or more mostly correct
Use Case(s) OR a correct Use Case Diagram.
Specify Models SOME of the requirements
using a suitable technique(s). Includes 1 or more
Use Case(s) OR a Use Case Diagram.
b
Specify No evidence of analysis and modeling of
the requirements.
0.
Assumptions/Constraints cogently
addresses all relevant assumptions and
constraints.
Assumptions/Constraints most relevant
assumptions and constraints are addressed.
Assumptions/Constraints some relevant
assumptions and constraints are addressed.
Assumptions/Constraints some relevant
assumptions and constraints, with tenuous
relevance , are addressed.
b
Assumptions/Constraints No assumptions
and constraints are addressed.
1
Validation All requirements logically linked to
the business need, using an appropriate technique.
Validation Most requirements logically linked to
the business need, using an appropriate technique.
Validation Some requirements logically linked
to the business need.
Validation Few requirements logically linked to
the business need. b
Validation No evidence of validation process.
Introduction Conclusion
Exec Summary
4
Highly relevant and comprehensive
introduction, conclusion and executive summary.
Relevant and reasonably thorough
introduction, conclusion and executive summary.
Somewhat relevant and/or thorough
introduction, conclusion and executive summary.
Partially relevant and/or thorough introduction,
conclusion and executive summary. b
Irrelevant and/or incomplete and/or missing
introduction, conclusion and executive summary.
Format
3
Excellent formatting, grammar, presentation,
expression and overall professionalism
Good formatting, grammar, presentation,
expression and overall professionalism
Satisfactory formatting, grammar, presentation,
expression and overall professionalism
Borderline formatting, grammar, presentation,
expression and overall professionalism b
Unsatisfactory formatting, grammar,
presentation, expression and overall
professionalism